DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mutual Inv. Co., 37 So. 2d 817.

18 citing documents.

  • Frisard v. Autin 747 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Sellers v. Sellers 660 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    (1948); Wetherbee v. Lodwick Lumber Company, 194 La.
  • Bank of Southwest Louisiana v. Thibodeaux 441 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Co., , Wetherbee v. Lodwick Lbr.
  • Guaranty Sav. Assur. Co. v. NATIONAL AM. BK. 407 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    Co., , (1948); Lisi Realty, (La.App.
  • Kaplan v. University Lake Corp. 394 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
  • American Bank & Trust Co. Etc. v. F & W Const. 357 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
    Co., , (1948), their right to enforce the liens against the property by ordinary process continues to exist under C.C.P.
  • In re the Succession of Dunham 359 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    State v. Mutual Investment Co., Inc., , (1948) and Pettingill et al v. Hills, Inc., 199 La.
  • Lisi Realty, Inc. v. Plaisance 306 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Mr. Pizza, Inc. v. Furlow 230 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Fayard v. Celestan 227 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Co., , ; Pettingill v. Hills, Inc., 199 La.
  • Hibernia National Bank in New Orleans v. Mary 174 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Co., , ; Pettingill v. Hills, Inc., 199 La.
  • Rouseo v. Atlas Finance Co. 167 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    Co., , , in the following language: “ * * * This doctrine is particularly applicable to devolu-tive appeals perfected from judgments under which sales have been consummated.
  • Cloud v. Cloud 127 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
  • State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Sumrall 111 So. 2d 313 La. 1959
    557 , ; State v. Mutual Investment Company, Inc., , ; Rathborne Lumber & Supply Co., Inc. v. Harding, La.App., ; South Street Lumber Co. v. Dickerson, 235 La.
  • Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Musselman 100 So. 2d 507 La. 1958
    Co., Inc., , ; Ripp v. Perrault, La.App., ; Rathborne Lumber & Supply Co., Inc. v. Harding, La.App., ; Levenson v. Chancellor, La.App., ; Hirt v. City of New Orleans, 225 La.
  • City of Shreveport v. Brewer 72 So. 2d 308 La. 1954
    It is pertinently pointed out in that case, , : “It is sufficient to say that a criminal statute, in order to be valid and enforceable, must define the offense so specifically or accurately that any reader having ordinary intelligence will know when or whether his conduct is on the one side or the other side of the border line between that which is
  • Rathborne Lumber & Supply Co. v. Harding 56 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1952
    Co., Inc., ; , citing with approval Pettingill v. Hills, Inc., supra, it was said that the “ * * * appeal, however, can not and will not be entertained where it presents for consideration purely moot issues, such as those a decision on which (even if favorable to appellants) would be ineffective.
  • Walters v. Childers 38 So. 2d 160 La. 1948
    160 and State v. Mutual Investment Company, Inc., , .