Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Simpson, 43 So. 2d 585.

44 citing documents.

State v. Seifert 524 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
(1949); see also State v. Britton, 131 La.
State v. Kohler 434 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Jenkins 338 So. 2d 276 La. 1976
State v. Simpson, *281 , (1949)
State v. Devore 309 So. 2d 325 La. 1975
Art. 484; , (1949), cert.
State v. Link 301 So. 2d 339 La. 1974
157 , (1952); , (1949), cert.
State v. Watson 301 So. 2d 653 La. 1974
(1949); State v. Martinez, 220 La.
State v. Womack 283 So. 2d 708 La. 1973
Art. 484; , (1949) cert.
State v. Sinclair 245 So. 2d 365 La. 1971
State v. Douglas 237 So. 2d 382 La. 1970
The sole function of a bill of *583 particulars is to inform the accused in greater detail of the nature of the crime of which he is charged, .
State v. Anderson 229 So. 2d 329 La. 1969
955 , (documents); , (evidence produced at grand jury hearing); State v. Vallery, 214 La.
State v. Crook 221 So. 2d 473 La. 1969
955 , (documents) ; , (evidence produced at grand jury hearing); State v. Vallery, 214 La.
State v. Hall 218 So. 2d 320 La. 1969
955 , (documents); , (evidence produced at grand jury hearing); State v. Vallery, 214 La.
State v. Cardinale 206 So. 2d 510 La. 1968
284 , ; State v. Simpson, supra [ , ].
State v. Cardinale 206 So. 2d 510 La. 1968
284 , ; State v. Simpson, supra [ , ].
State v. Hopper 203 So. 2d 222 La. 1967
State v. Hunter 195 So. 2d 273 La. 1967
955 , (documents); , (evidence produced at grand jury hearing); State v. Vallery, 214 La.
State v. Brown 186 So. 2d 576 La. 1966
State v. Simien 178 So. 2d 266 La. 1965
284 , ; , ; State v. Martinez, 220 La.
State v. Pailet 165 So. 2d 294 La. 1964
495 , (statement of prosecuting witness) ; , (evidence produced at grand jury hearing); State v. Lea, 228 La.
State v. Garrison 154 So. 2d 400 La. 1963
State v. Faulk 140 So. 2d 374 La. 1962
“Not guilty.” The constitutionality of Article 386 , (1949).
State v. Minor 129 So. 2d 10 La. 1961
865 , ; , ; State v. Dowdy et al., 217 La.
State v. Newton 128 So. 2d 651 La. 1961
865 , ; , ; State v. Dowdy et al., 217 La.
State v. Wilson 127 So. 2d 158 La. 1961
495 ; , ; State v. Goins, 232 La.
State v. Bickham 121 So. 2d 207 La. 1960
State v. Kelly 112 So. 2d 674 La. 1959
and authorities cited therein.
State v. Brazile 99 So. 2d 62 La. 1958
and authorities cited therein.” Again, in State v. Labat, 226 La.
State v. Harris 95 So. 2d 496 La. 1957
State v. Weston 95 So. 2d 305 La. 1957
284 , ; , ; State v. Martinez, 220 La.
State v. Horaist 90 So. 2d 802 La. 1956
745 ; , ; State v. De Soto, 221 La.
State v. Butler 89 So. 2d 294 La. 1956
Criticized State v. Mills 86 So. 2d 895 La. 1956
201 , ; , ; State v. Poe, 214 La.
State v. Dabbs 84 So. 2d 601 La. 1955
State v. Lea 84 So. 2d 169 La. 1955
State v. Martinez, 220 La.
State v. Jeane 78 So. 2d 518 La. 1955
745 ; , ; State v. DeSoto, 221 La.
State v. Labat 75 So. 2d 333 La. 1954
284 , ; , ; State v. Haddad, 221 La.
State v. Carter 74 So. 2d 902 La. 1954
745 ; , ; State v. De Soto, 221 La.
State v. Shourds 71 So. 2d 340 La. 1954
782 , ; , ; State v. Martinez, 220 La.
State v. Winfield 62 So. 2d 258 La. 1952
291 , ; , ; State v. Bessar, 213 La.
State v. Rone 62 So. 2d 114 La. 1952
745 , , we shall discuss all bills taken by defendant.
State v. De Soto 60 So. 2d 65 La. 1952
State v. Haddad 59 So. 2d 411 La. 1952
this is another effort on the part of a defendant in a criminal case to extend the holding of this court in State v. Dorsey, supra, that an accused is entitled to a pre-trial inspection of his written admission or confession, so as to include any statement of the defendant although neither a confessio
State v. Martinez 57 So. 2d 888 La. 1952
State v. Martinez 57 So. 2d 888 La. 1952