Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Conley v. City of Shreveport, 43 So. 2d 223.

25 citing documents.

Abate v. Healthcare Intern., Inc. 560 So. 2d 812 La. 1990
Reynolds v. City of Pineville 546 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Madere 352 So. 2d 666 La. 1977
State v. Neal 347 So. 2d 1139 La. 1977
521 , (1958); , (1950); State ex rel Payne v. Exchange Bank of Natchitoches, 147 La.
Lafourche Parish Water Dist. v. Carl Heck Engrs. 346 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
What the Fisher case did definitely hold, , [1949], [La.App.
Fisher v. State ex rel. Department of Labor 265 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Due to the wording of the title and body of the statute as it formerly read, , , and followed in Labit v. Terrebonne Parish School Board, La.App., .
Constant v. State 255 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Parish of Jefferson v. Louisiana Department of Corrections 254 So. 2d 582 La. 1971
Section 2, Act 353 of 1970; , (1949).
Huppenbauer v. Kissinger 254 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
656 (1937); , (1949) ; Roberts v. City of Baton Rouge, 236 La.
Russell v. McKeithen 242 So. 2d 229 La. 1970
Associated General Contractors of America v. Police Jury of Pointe Coupee Parish 225 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Due to the wording of the title and body of the statute as it formerly read, , 43 So.
Buras v. Orleans Parish Democratic Executive Committee 177 So. 2d 576 La. 1965
873 ; , ; Louisiana Board of Pharmacy v. Smith, 226 La.
Succession of Simms 175 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Gautreau v. Board of Electrical Examiners 167 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
1022 , ; , ; Jackson v. Coxe, 208 La.
Dudoussat v. Louisiana State Racing Commission 133 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
1043 , ; , ; State v. Arthur Duvic’s Sons, 185 La.
Rushing v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. 129 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Or, as said in Conley v. City of Shreveport, 1949, , .
James v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 113 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
iod of some ten years, more or less, has made similar payments or contributions to the Red River Valley Improvement Association, and, accordingly, counsel for defendant argues that this “long-standing interpretation placed upon a statute by administrative officials should not be overruled” without positive and definite proof that their interpretation is wrong, , .
Cobb v. Louisiana Board of Institutions 111 So. 2d 126 La. 1959
State Licensing Bd. of Con. v. State Civil Serv. Com'n 110 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
In re Interstate Trust & Banking Co., 204 La.
Roberts v. City of Baton Rouge 108 So. 2d 111 La. 1958
1022 , ; , ; Jackson v. Coxe, 208 La.
Kahn v. Urania Lumber Company 103 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
541 , ; , ; Melancon v. Mizell, 216 La.
Gilmore v. State 79 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
If the special statute were construed as unconstitutionally attempting to create tort liability in the State, nevertheless the invalidity of one portion of the act would not invalidate the valid portion of the act, the latter being independent of the invalid portion, , ; Louisiana State Department of Agriculture v. Sibille, 207 La.
Hanson v. International Union of Operating Eng. 79 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Louisiana State Department of Agriculture v. Sibille, 207 La.
Fireside Mut. Life Ins. v. Martin 66 So. 2d 511 La. 1953
Labit v. Terrebonne Parish School Board 49 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
The extent and construction of Act No. 73 of 1926 was passed on by our Supreme Court in 1949 , , where it was held in substance that the act, being no broader than its title, did not require a governmental body to let every construction job out on contract where the cost exceeded the minimum fixed in the act, but it only established the method for letting of such contracts where it was decided th

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by