DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 43 So. 2d 248.

34 citing documents.

  • Ashley-Roxanne N'Dakpri, Lynn Schofield, and Evangela Michelle Robertson v. Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology; Steve Young; in his … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
    1231 ( providing that the test to be applied in determining whether an ordinance or statute is a reasonable exercise of government' s police power is " whether there is a real and substantial relationship between the regulation imposed and the prevention of injury to the public or the promotion of the general welfare"); - 179, 43 So.
  • Deer Enterprises, LLC v. Parish Council of Washington Parish 56 So. 3d 936 La. 2011
    1094 , (1959); , (1949).
  • City of New Orleans v. Bd. of Dir. of State Museum 739 So. 2d 748 La. 1999
    of Alcoholic Beverage Control, , (1949).
  • Paillot v. Wooton 559 So. 2d 758 La. 1990
  • State v. Spooner 520 So. 2d 336 La. 1988
    (1949), the police power allows: such reasonable conditions as may be deemed by the governing authority of the country essential to the safety, health, peace, good order, and morals of the community.
  • Comeaux v. Roy 517 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Control, , (1949); VII Records 1446 (statement of Delegate Avant).
  • Acadian Metropolitan Code Authority v. Miller 465 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    523 (1939); Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana Board, Etc., , (1940); City of Lake Charles v. Hasha, 238 La.
  • Francis v. Morial 455 So. 2d 1168 La. 1984
    Control, , (1949); VII Records 1446 (statement of Delegate Avant).
  • Callais Cablevision, Inc. v. Houma Cablevision, Inc. 451 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    396 , (1958); , (1949); Wes-T-Erre Development *13 Corp. v. Parish of Terrebonne, Police Jury of Parish of Terrebonne, (La.App.
  • Department of Transportation & Development v. Majors 440 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    (1949), the Louisiana Supreme Court, quoting from 11 American Jurisprudence verbo Constitutional Law, Section 267, stated: “ ‘Although constitutional guaranties cannot be transgressed, it is settled that the possession and enjoyment of all rights are subject to the police power which includes such reaso
  • Wes-T-Erre Dev. Corp. v. PARISH OF TERREBONNE, ETC. 416 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    523 (1939); Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana Board, Etc., , (1949); City of Lake Charles v. Hasha, 238 La.
  • City of Lafayette v. Butcher Air Conditioning Co. 392 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    523 (1939); Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana Board, Etc., , (1949); City of Lake Charles v. Hasha, 238 La.
  • City of Shreveport v. Curry 357 So. 2d 1078 La. 1978
    396 , (1958); , (1949); State v. Blake, 170 La.
  • City of Lake Charles v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 310 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    523 (1939); Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana Board, Etc., , (1949); City of Lake Charles v. Hasha, 238 La.
  • Nomey v. State 315 So. 2d 709 La. 1975
  • City of Crowley Firemen v. City of Crowley 280 So. 2d 897 La. 1973
  • Hi-Lo Oil Company v. City of Crowley 274 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    523 (1939); Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana Board, Etc., , (1949); City of Lake Charles v. Hasha, 238 La.
  • Bonnette v. Karst 261 So. 2d 589 La. 1972
    Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana *595 Board, Etc., , ; Everhardt v. City of New Orleans, 253 La.
  • Bonnette v. Karst 261 So. 2d 589 La. 1971
    Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana Board, Etc., , ; Everhardt v. City of New Orleans, 253 La.
  • State ex rel. Bogan 250 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    The court quoted the following passage from Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana A. B. C. Board, 216 La.1948, (1949): “It is elementary that an act of the Legislature is presumed to be legal, and the judiciary is without right to declare it unconstitutional unless that is manifest.
  • Everhardt v. City of New Orleans 217 So. 2d 400 La. 1968
    “It is elementary that an act of the Legislature is presumed to be legal, and the judiciary is without right to declare it unconstitutional unless that is manifest.
  • Everhardt v. City of New Orleans 208 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    In Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana Board, etc., , , at p. 255 the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "It is elementary that an act of the Legislature is presumed to be legal, and the judiciary is without right to declare it unconstitutional unless that is manifest.
  • Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets v. Louisiana Milk Commission 200 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Plaintiff relies heavily on the reasoning of the Supreme Court in the cases of Schwegmann Brothers v. Louisiana Board of Alcohol Beverage Control (1949) , , as well as Reynolds v. Louisiana Board of Alcohol Beverage Control (1966) 249 La.
  • Reynolds v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control 185 So. 2d 794 La. 1966
    Yet, that is the unseemly posture of our jurisprudence since our 1949 , , 14 A.L.R.2d 680 and, albeit the Court had the opportunity in this case to remedy the defect, the majority has preferred to stand fast in perpetuation of the paradox.
  • Reynolds v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control 181 So. 2d 377 La. 1965
    128 ), and that such regulations must be pursuant to a legitimate exercise of the State's police power, which includes the respecting of constitutional guarantees ( , , 14 A.L.R.2d 680 ).
  • Reynolds v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control 173 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    That they do have a constitutional right to engage in the wholesale liquor business on an equal and nondiscriminatory basis with other persons has been clearly *61 settled by our Supreme Court in Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana Board, etc., , , 14 A.L.R.2d 680 (1949), and any denial or limitation of that right is an unconstitutional invasion of such right unless it can be justified as a reasonable exercise of the police power of the state.
  • State v. Goldfinch 132 So. 2d 860 La. 1961
    Board of *967 Alcoholic Beverage Control, , , 14 A.L.R.2d 680 ; Olivedell Planting Co. v. Town of Lake Providence, 217 La.
  • State v. Southwestern Electric Power Co. 127 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    146 A.L.R.2d 680 , the opinion of the court quoted and approved the general rule as to the valid exercise of the police power set forth in Sections 302 and 303 of 11 Amer.Juris., verbo "Constitutional Law," which quotation we repeat as follows: *316 "The fixed rule and basic standard by which the
  • Randolph v. Village of Turkey Creek 126 So. 2d 341 La. 1961
    1059 , ; , , 14 A.L.R.2d 680 ; Roksvaag v. Reily, 237 La.
  • Roksvaag v. Reily 113 So. 2d 285 La. 1959
    In support of her contention, appellee cites and .relies upon the following cases: , , 14 A.L.R.2d 680 ; Twiggs v. Journeymen Barbers, etc., La.App., ; Douglas Public Service Corp. v. Gaspard, 225 La.
  • Banjavich v. Louisiana Licensing Board for Marine Divers 111 So. 2d 505 La. 1959
  • Dr. G. H. Tichenor Antiseptic Co. v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets 90 So. 2d 343 La. 1956
    1 , , , 14 A.L.R.2d 680 .
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Rebowe 75 So. 2d 239 La. 1954
    302, pp. 1074, 1075; see, also, , at page 170, ., 14 A.L.R.2d 680 ; City of DeRidder v. Mangano, 186 La.
  • Morris v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control 57 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1952
    See [ ] , [ 14 A.L.R.2d 680 ] Schwegmann v. La.