Webb v. W. W. Development Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 28, 1955 78 So. 2d 418; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 9, 1931 138 So. 137; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 2, 1906 3 Teiss. 412; La., May 15, 1875 27 La. 379
Webb v. W. W. Development Co., 267 So. 2d 621 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Lard Electric Co. v. Miller & Associates Construction Co. 267 So. 2d 616
Opinion text
FRUGÉ, Judge. For the reasons assigned in the companion suit, Lard Electric Company, Inc. v. Miller & Associates Construction Company, Inc., et al., 267 So.2d 616 (La.App.3rd Cir., 1972), decided this date, the portion of the judgment appealed from which found plaintiff’s lien untimely filed is reversed and defendants-appellees are held liable in solido with Miller & Associates Construction Company under LSA-R.S. 9:4812 for claims of plaintiff arising out of services performed on and materials delivered to appellees’ property under contract with Miller. (Such contract being issued under and as part of the prime contract work). This case is remanded for a determination of the amount of liability consistent with our findings in Lard Electric Company, Inc. v. Miller & Associates Construction Company, Inc., et al., supra. Appellees are to pay all costs of this appeal. Reversed in part and remanded.