Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of New Orleans v. Board of Supervisors, 43 So. 2d 237.

34 citing documents.

Gerald Rodney White and Charlotte White v. Louisiana Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
of Sup’rs of 8 Elections for Parish of Orleans, So.2d 237, 246 (1949) (quoting 50 Am.
White v. La. Dep't of Transp. & Dev. 258 So. 3d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
of Sup'rs of Elections for Parish of Orleans , , , 246 (1949) (quoting 50 Am.
Miller v. Lammico 973 So. 2d 693 La. 2008
of Sup'rs., , (1949); State v. Shushan, 206 La.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., INC. v. Hilton 966 So. 2d 545 La. 2007
of Supervisors, , (1949)).
Succession of Daigle 822 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Antoine 721 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co. 694 So. 2d 184 La. 1997
State v. Saizan 692 So. 2d 1045 La. 1997
State v. LOUISIANA RIVERBOAT GAMING COM'N & HORSESHOE ENTERT. 655 So. 2d 292 La. 1995
of Supervisors, , (1949); Abbeville v. Police Jury, 207 La.
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
Contrast City of New *1319
First Nat. Bank v. Beckwith MacHinery Co. 650 So. 2d 1148 La. 1995
City of New Orleans v. Board of Supervisors of Elections, Parish of Orleans, , (1949), reh'g denied.
Cart v. Louisiana State Racing Commission 591 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
of Supervisors of Elections for Parish of Orleans, , (1949); (La.App.
GI Joe, Inc. v. CHEVRON USA, INC. PIPELINE DIV. 561 So. 2d 62 La. 1990
(1949); Colwell v. State, Office of Atty.
Colwell v. State, Office of Atty. Gen. 506 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
(1949); Bunch v. Town of St.
Guste Ex Rel. Courville v. Burris 427 So. 2d 1178 La. 1983
Johnston v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury 424 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
State ex rel. Wright 408 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
State, in Interest of Sapia 397 So. 2d 469 La. 1981
1027 , (1966); , (1949).
Wilkinson v. Wilkinson 323 So. 2d 120 La. 1975
(1949), this Court summarized certain rules of statutory interpretation applicable to the instant case: In the case of State v. Shusan, 206 La.
Bradford v. City of Shreveport 305 So. 2d 487 La. 1974
441 , (1958); , (1950); Pyle v. City of Shreveport, 215 La.
Bradford v. City of Shreveport 266 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
Legros v. Conner 212 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
James v. Orange Savings & Loan Ass'n 195 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Jarrell v. Gordy, La.App., ; , .
Succession of Simms 195 So. 2d 114 La. 1966
See Article 17 Revised Civil Code; , ; Hall v. Rosteet, 247 La.
Johnson v. Collector of Revenue 165 So. 2d 466 La. 1964
and authorities there cited.
Newlin v. Jefferson Parish Council ex rel. Schouest 146 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
1 The Legislature is presumed to have been aware of this jurisprudence when it adopted the statutes ( , ) and yet the original Discovery Statute (formerly R.S.
Tritico v. Board of Commissioners 134 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
and State v. Shushan, 206 La.
State Ex Rel. Saint v. Toups 95 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Ladnier v. Mollere 89 So. 2d 301 La. 1956
See City of New Orleans v. Board of Supervisors of Elections for Parish of Orleans, 1949, , , as to the value of the historical approach ' in constitutional interpretation.
Louisiana Board of Pharmacy v. Smith 76 So. 2d 722 La. 1954
where that rule is quoted and followed.
Louisiana Board of Pharmacy v. Smith 65 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Chappuis v. Reggie 62 So. 2d 92 La. 1952
State v. St. Julian 61 So. 2d 464 La. 1952
569 ).” , , 247 that “In the case of State v. Shushan, 206 La.
Tedesco v. Board of Sup'rs of Elections 43 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1949