Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Berniard v. Galiano, 71 So. 2d 861.

27 citing documents.

Succession of Carolyn Gauthier Bargeman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Compare with Talbot v. Talbot, 03-814 (La.
Succession of Ronnie Mack Goodman La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Succession of Charles B. Fanz, Jr. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
In re Dauterive 251 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Bailey v. Eikert 210 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
1 , (1954): By the terms of Article 1539 of the LSA-C.C., “The manual gift, that is, the giving of corporal movable effects, accompanied by real delivery, is not subject to any formality.” This article does not dispense, however, with the necessity of proof of intention on the part of the donor to give.
O'Krepki v. O'Krepki 193 So. 3d 574 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
Jones v. Jones 86 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In Re Succession of Jones 986 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Rivoire v. Maturin 816 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Succession of Serio 597 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Succession of Young 563 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Succession of Diffey 543 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Succession of Daroca 536 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Broussard v. Crochet, Broussard & Co. 477 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Butler v. Reddick 431 So. 2d 396 La. 1983
Succession of Miller 405 So. 2d 812 La. 1981
1, 9 , , 864 (1954); (La.
Hayes v. Dompe 331 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
1 , (1954); writ denied, ; Faust v. Curtis, et al
TL James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery 308 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
1 , (1954): "This article (Art. 1539) does not dispense, however, with the necessity of proof of intention on the part of the donor to give.
Woodward v. Lewis 292 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
1 , (1954), wherein it was pointed out: "By the terms of Article 1539 of the LSA-C.C., `The manual gift, that is, the giving of corporeal movable effects, accompanied by real delivery, is not subject to any formality.'
Faust v. Curtis 278 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Succession of Brewster 259 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
Simon v. Trahan 235 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
1 , ; Funderburk v. Funderburk, 214 La.
Succession of Oulliber v. Oulliber 204 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
1 , ; Funderburk v. Funderburk, 214 La.
Vela v. Slavich 185 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Succession of Moses 145 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Moody v. Gossen 125 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
1 , , wherein proof of a manual gift was considered, that court stated; “ * * * The manual gift, that is, the giving of corporeal movable effects, accompanied by real delivery, is not subject to any formality.’ This article does not dispense, however, with the necessity of proof of intention on the part of the donor
Succession of McCrocklin 126 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960