Stull v. Russo
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 6, 1970 239 So. 2d 387; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 2, 1970 236 So. 2d 94; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 9, 1931 138 So. 173; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., May 24, 1973 274 So. 2d 767
Stull v. Russo, 85 So. 2d 116 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Stull v. Russo 85 So. 2d 112
Opinion text
ELLIS,-Judge. This is..a companion suit to Stull v. V. J. Russo, La.App., 85 So.2d 112 . The only evidence in the record to indicate any relationship between L.' J. Russo, father, and the injured employee, is that L. J. Russo owned the land upon which V. J. Russo son operated the business in which plaintiff was injured. Since defendant herein was not plaintiff's employer, the judgment of District Court dismissing plaintiff’s suit as against L. J. Russo is affirmed. This suit is in forma pauperis, and therefore plaintiff will not be assessed with costs.