Choppin v. Wilson
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 12, 1973 274 So. 2d 496; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 7, 1970 242 So. 2d 269; La. Ct. App. 2d Cir., March 16, 1932 140 So. 104
Choppin v. Wilson, 27 La. 444 (1875).
Opinion text
On Motion to Dismiss. MORGAN, J. Plaintiff moves to dismiss this appeal because the testimony of two material witnesses heard on the trial, and a certain document offered, in evidence is not in the record. The certificate of the clerk is in the usual and proper form. If the appellant has not seen to having a proper record placed before ns and the evidence has not come up upon which he expects to get a judgment, lie must take the consequences. If the evidence is necessary to the plaintiff, he should have suggested a diminution of the' record and asked for a certiorari. The motion to dismiss is denied.