Olivier v. Abunza
Also decided on this docket: La., November 8, 1954 76 So. 2d 528
Olivier v. Abunza, 76 So. 2d 528 (La. 1954).
Cited by
- Vidrine v. Vidrine 497 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Short v. Fink 372 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
- Johnson v. Romaguera 349 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1977
- Johnson v. Johnson 296 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
- Bynum v. Bynum 296 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
- Cowart v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 273 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Davis v. Davis 258 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Adler v. Adler 239 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
- Karl v. Karl 191 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
- LaFiette v. Travelers Insurance Co. 191 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
- Phillips v. Insurance Co. of North America 181 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
- Schwander v. Foster 165 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Opinion text
McCALEB, Justice (concurring). I am in accord with the conclusion of the majority but for a different reason than that announced in the opinion. It appears to me that, when Mr. Olivier failed to contest the abandonment suit brought by his former wife in 1952 and suffered judgment to go against him by default, he forfeited the right to deny her claim that she was without fault as it had already been judicially recognized that he was solely at fault. Therefore, it matters not whether her previous conduct was the underlying cause .of the separation. For this reason, I concur in the decree.