Vives v. Vives
Vives v. Vives, 79 So. 2d 873 (La. 1955).
Cited by
- Harris v. Poche 930 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
- Cousins v. Realty Ventures, Inc. 844 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- Timmerman v. Smith 413 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- DeSoto v. Ellis 393 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
- Latter & Blum, Inc. v. Richmond 388 So. 2d 368 La. 1980
- Burdon v. Harvey 385 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
- Leggio v. Realty Mart, Inc. 303 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
- Kearney v. Maloney 296 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
- Hebert v. Mayeur and Company, Inc. 296 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
- Leatherman v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 275 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Patterson v. City of De Ridder 103 So. 2d 68 La. 1958
- Courville v. Travelers Insurance Co. 99 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Vives v. Vives 223 La. 708
- Vives v. Vives 67 So. 2d 329
Opinion text
HAMITER, Justice. While one phase of this partition proceeding was pending in this court, decree rendered June 1, 1953, 223 La. 708 , 66 So.2d 617 , the district court (on April 24, 1953) rendered a judgment decreeing that the notary public recast the proposed partition of the funds then in his hands ($3803.70), particularly with respect to certain costs and fees that were ordered charged against the mass. Plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeal, Orleans Circuit, from the part of the judgment which she considered adverse to her interest. That court, concluding that it was without jurisdiction, transferred the appeal here. See 67 So.2d 329 . When the cause came on for argument and submission appellant’s counsel announced that he had prepared no brief and desired to submit the matter on the transcript of appeal without oral argument. A similar announcement was made by appellees’ counsel. Since no error in the ruling' complained of has been pointed out and our careful *538 examination • of' the record has disclosed none we cannot and will not disturb the judgment from which this appeal was taken. The judgment is affirmed.