State v. Callia
State v. Callia, 86 So. 2d 909 (La. 1956).
Cited by
- Robinson v. Melton Truck Lines, Inc. 244 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- O'Reilly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 230 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Woods v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 172 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
- Holt v. All State Insurance 131 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- State v. Baum 88 So. 2d 209 La. 1956
- State v. Mills 88 So. 2d 210 La. 1956
- State v. Dominguez 88 So. 2d 660 La. 1956
- State v. Forsyth 87 So. 2d 608 La. 1956
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Mills 229 La. 758
Opinion text
PONDER, Justice. The defendants are appealing from a conviction and sentence under a bill of information charging them with conducting the business of gambling in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:90 by the operation of a lottery at 3703 Third Street in the City of New Orleans. During the course of the trial, there were thirty-five bills of exception taken to the rulings of the trial judge. These bills of exception were taken to the overruling of a motion for a bill of particulars, a motion to quash, a demurrer, a plea to the jurisdiction, objection to the admission of evidence, a motion for a new trial and a motion in arrest of judgment. All of the questions raised in these bills of exception were raised and passed on in the case of State v. Mills, 229 La. 758 , 86 So.2d 895 . It could serve no useful purpose to reiterate the questions raised and the conclusions reached by this Court because the same conclusions would necessarily have to be reached in this case. For the reasons assigned, the convictions and sentences are affirmed. POURNET, C. J., and MOISE, J., absent.