Arceneaux v. Arceneaux
Arceneaux v. Arceneaux, 94 So. 2d 449 (La. 1957).
Cited by
- Larocca v. Larocca 597 So. 2d 1000 La. 1992
- Larocca v. Larocca 579 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Draper v. Draper 554 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. Arceneaux 112 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 115 La. 469 not in our corpus
- In re Lambert 39 So. 447
- Interdiction of Roddy 230 La. 635
Opinion text
On Application for Rehearing PER CURIAM. In an application for rehearing counsel for appellee complain that we “erred in considering the life insurance policy mentioned and in considering the effect of the divorce judgment, the court *499 not being called upon nor asked to rule with regard to those matters and those matters not being before the court for decision.” The complaint has merit, for the only question presented by the motion to dismiss the appeal (and on which we were entitled to rule) was whether or not the divorce action had abated on the death of plaintiff. See In re Lambert, 115 La. 469 , 39 So. 447 and Interdiction of Roddy, 230 La. 635 , 89 So.2d 150 . Accordingly, our opinion to the extent thus -complained of is not binding on the parties, and insofar as the status or effect of the judgment is concerned the appeal is dismissed without prejudice to their rights. The application for rehearing is denied.