Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ellsworth v. Tedesco, 105 So. 2d 264.

17 citing documents.

  • Winchell v. Johnson Properties, Inc. 640 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Sumner v. Foremost Ins. Co. 417 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    673 , (1970); , (1958); (La.App.
  • Fonseca v. Marlin Marine Corp. 410 So. 2d 674 La. 1981
    Olsen v. Shell Oil Co., supra; , (1958) defective water heater; (La.App.
  • Latham v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 377 So. 2d 350 La. 1979
    Cir. 1957) (on rehearing), affd, , (1958).
  • Olsen v. Shell Oil Co. 365 So. 2d 1285 La. 1978
  • Ward v. Conn 344 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
  • Templin v. Traders & General Insurance Company 288 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
  • Weiland v. King 262 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    84 A.L.R.2d 1184 , .” Assuming that the light switches were on and that plaintiff did in fact find herself in total darkness on the second landing, which would be a fact finding most favorable to the plaintiff, the only conclusion that can be- reached as to the cause of t
  • Jackson v. Insurance Co. of North America 243 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    However, before a lessor can be held liable for injuries incurred as a result of alleged defective premises, petitioner must prove that such alleged defects constituted the proximate cause of the injury, , .
  • Turner v. Powers 198 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    84 A.L.R.2d 1184 ; Allen v. Honeycutt, La.App., .
  • Morgan v. American Indemnity Company 180 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Allen v. Honeycutt 171 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    LSA-Civil Code Articles 2315, 2316, 2322 , , 84 A.L.R.2d 1184 (1958).
  • Murphy v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York 138 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
    *137 Similarly, , , the opinion of Mr. Justice Hawthorne contained the following statement of the issue involved: "The instant suit is based on Article 670 and 2322 of the Louisiana Civil Code, which place a duty on the owner of a building to keep his premises in repair and make him answerable for damage either occasion
  • Smith v. Reid 136 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Sumrall v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 124 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Harris v. Tremont Lumber Co., 115 La.
  • Brown & Blackwood v. Ricou-Brewster Building Co. 121 So. 2d 70 La. 1960
    294 , and Dunn v. Tedesco, La.App., ; , , plaintiffs had not sustained the burden of proving their case by a preponderance of the evidence.
  • Davilla v. Richardson 120 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Boudro v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., supra.” On certiorari in the same case the Supreme Court, , , said: “The instant suit is based on Articles 670 and 2322 of the Louisiana Civil Code, which place a duty on the owner of a building to keep his premises in repair and make him answerable for damage either occasioned by its ruin when caused by his neglect to repair it or resulting from a vice in