Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Crowell v. New Hampshire Fire Ins. Co., 147 So. 762.

17 citing documents.

Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Bulliard Farm, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Bulliard Farm 915 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Gaylord Container Corporation v. CNA Ins. Companies 807 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Mike Hooks, Inc. v. Argonaut-Southwest Insurance 370 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Thibeau v. LeBlanc 198 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
2 Cir., .” Thus in the Maggio case, we held that the insurance company was estopped from raising the question of insurable interest where the policy was issued in the name of another than the owner of the motor vehicle.
Collins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 188 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
Maggio v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 123 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Cain v. Employers Casualty Company 110 So. 2d 108 La. 1959
App., ], Crowell v. New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co., supra *1092 [La.App., ]; Brooks v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Co., La.App.1932, 144 So.
Maggio v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 102 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Cain v. Employers Casualty Company 96 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
1933, , and cases therein cited.
Maryland Casualty Company v. Kramel 80 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
Co., La.App., , and then in Ouachita Parish Police Jury v. Northern Insurance Co. of New York, supra.
Daigle v. Great American Indemnity Co. 70 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Co., La.App., , the Court of Appeal of the Second Circuit stated: "Plaintiff has prayed for 12 per cent., as damages, and for reasonable attorney's fees.
Randazzo v. Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania 200 So. 267 La. 1941
Co., La.App., and Brough v. Presidential Fire & Marine Ins.
People's Homestead & Savings Ass'n v. Worley 185 So. 880 La. 1939
n error and mistake * * * ” to have an instrument reformed, and that courts will not lend their aid in their “ * * * equity jurisdiction to reform an instrument and correct a mistake and error unless the mistake and error was mutual between all parties to said instrument and all parties affected thereby.” , a decision of the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second circuit.
Ouachita Parish Police Jury v. Northern Ins. Co. of New York 176 So. 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Singleton v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co. 160 So. 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
App.) ; Topps v. North British & Mercantile Ins.
Topps v. North British & Mercantile Ins. 148 So. 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
wishing insurance thereon was informed by agency that it would be necessary to have division number, and was misinformed by some one at warehouse as to division in which bags were stored, policy insuring them while in that division was not the result of meetings of minds to insure goods wherever stored, and could not be reformed accordingly.” • , decided by this court on April 28th, this year (not yet reported [in State report]), the policy was reformed, after loss from fire, to the extent of su