DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brown v. Wade, 145 So. 790.

17 citing documents.

  • Curry v. Fruin-Colnon Contracting Co. 202 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    See Andrus v. White, La.App., , Brown v. Wade, La.App., , Bourg v. Brownell-Drews Lumber Co., 120 La.
  • Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 200 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Briefly stated they include closeness of ties between the parties and the degree of love and affection, Andrus v. White, La.App., ; the age of the child and station in life of the parents, Brown v. Wade, La.App., ; probability and degree of future support by the child, Bourg v. Brownell-Drews Lumber Co., 120 La.
  • Smith v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company 185 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    2 Cir., ; and Embry v. Reserve Natural Gas Co., 2 Cir., 12 La.App.
  • Lewis v. State 176 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    ases of this nature is correctly summarized in the brief of learned counsel for appellee, as follows: "The factors to be considered in fixing the amount of an award in a death action include closeness of the ties between the parties and the degree of love and affection (Andrus v. White [La.App.], 107 [101] So.2d 7); the age of the child and station in life of the parents (Brown v. Wade [La.App.], ); probability and degree of future support by the child (Bourg v. Brownell-Drews Lumber Co., 120 La
  • Lehmann v. Marquette Casualty Co. 158 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    as follows: “When the operator of an automobile discovers the presence of small children on the roadside, ahead of him, it is his duty to travel at such a rate of speed, and bring his vehicle under such control, that an accident will be averted, regardless of the unexpected and unforeseen movement
  • Walker v. Jarnevich 102 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
  • Brown v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 96 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    145 ; Jamison v. State, La.App., ; Brown v. Wade, La.App., ; Palermo v. Orleans Ice Mfg.
  • Jenkins v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, NJ 83 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
    App., , counsel for plaintiff contends that defendant, Albritton, by the exercise of reasonable care, could have averted the accident, citing in support of this position Albritton's testimony on cross-examination to the effect that he could have averted the accident by applying his brakes at a distance of 250 feet, at which
  • Matthews v. Franklin 74 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    775 ; ; Cimo v. Karstendiek, 173 So.
  • Doyle v. Nelson 11 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    In Brown v. Wade, La.App., , decided by this court, the child was injured on a highway.
  • Borman v. Lafargue 183 So. 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    App., ; and Guillory v. Horecky et al., 185 La.
  • Llorens v. McCann 175 So. 442 La. 1937
    481 , , and in Moreau v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 158 So.
  • Kahn v. Shreveport Railways Co. 161 So. 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    App.) ; Jacoby v. Gallaher, 10 La.
  • Ledet v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 160 So. 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    App.) ; Baptiste v. Mateu (La.
  • Peperone v. Lee 160 So. 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1935
    App.) ; Baptiste v. Mateu (La.
  • Wise v. Eubanks 159 So. 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    App.) , and authorities therein cited, as Eubanks admits the child and his parents were seen by him walking down the road for a considerable distance before the tragedy.'
  • Moreau v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 158 So. 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    App.) , to be: “When the operator of an automobile discovers the presence of small children on the roadside, ahead of him, it is his duty to travel at such a rate of speed, and bring his vehicle under such control, that an accident will be averted, regardless of the unexpected and unforeseen movement of any of the chil