Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jemison, 125 So. 2d 365.

28 citing documents.

Charles A. Rivault, Arthur R. Lejeune, Claudia J. Lejeune, William J. Gibson, and Audubon Terrace Resident Homeowners Association … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Lakewood Property Owners' Ass'n v. Kyle 183 So. 3d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hijazi v. Dentler 125 So. 3d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Wright v. Griggs 821 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
794 , (1960), the supreme court affirmed an injunction issued to prohibit a threatened violation of building restrictions by an owner who admitted that the house he planned to build would be in violation.
Travasos v. Stoma 672 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Lakeshore Property Owners v. Delatte 579 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Diefenthal v. Longue Vue Management Corp. 561 So. 2d 44 La. 1990
794 , (1961), we relied on the following principles.
Lakeshore Property Owners v. Delatte 524 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Ritter v. Fabacher 517 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Cook v. Hoover 428 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Schwab v. Kelton 405 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Gwatney v. Miller 371 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Mulberry Ass'n v. Richards 369 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
794 , (1961) the Supreme Court recognized that as long as restrictions are of any value to the party possessing rights under these restrictions, he may enforce them.
Deshotels v. Fruge 364 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Hargroder v. City of Eunice 341 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
794 , (1960); Edwards v. Wiseman, supra; Hill v. William P. Ross, Inc., 166 La.
Allen v. Forbess 345 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
East Parker Properties, Inc. v. Pelican Realty Co. 335 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Camelot Citizens Association v. Stevens 329 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
794 , (1960), wherein the Supreme Court quoted with approval from the opinion of the Court of Appeal ( ) as follows: "Such technical violations can in no wise, we think, add to or take from the objects and purposes of the general scheme of development and will, therefore, be disregarded as immaterial to t
Mouille v. Henry 321 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Beyt v. Woodvale Place Apartments 297 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
794 , (1961); McGuffy v. Weil, 240 La.
Melrose Civic Ass'n v. Universal Builders, Inc. 289 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
794 , (1961), involved a subdivision in which the original owners had included a building restriction requiring 30 feet clearance from each side of the property line, and 80 feet set back form the front property line.
Fuller v. Hill Properties, Inc. 259 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
794 , (1960), in which the supreme court in considering whether subdivision restrictions had been waived by repeated minor setback violations, quoted with approval the following language found in the opinion of the court of appeal: "`.
Fortson v. Lawrence 254 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Adams v. Brian 212 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Adair v. Chrysler 212 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
794 , (1961) wherein Justice Hamiter was confronted with whether, vel non, the restrictive covenants had been so disregarded and abandoned as to constitute a subversion of the original scheme of the East Ridge Subdivision of Caddo Parish as to result in a substantial change in the neighborhood.
Fisher v. Smith 190 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
794 , ; Edwards v. Wiseman, 198 La.
Marquess v. Bamburg 188 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
Wright v. DeFatta 152 So. 2d 10 La. 1963
794 , (1960); Yanow v. Seven Oaks Park, Inc., 15 N.J.Super.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by