DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tuck v. Harmon, 151 So. 803.

13 citing documents.

  • Blanchard v. Ogima 215 So. 2d 902 La. 1968
    1st Cir. 1936); (La.App.
  • Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION 141 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
    2d Cir., 1934, ; Gager v. Teche Transfer Co., La.App.
  • Martin v. Brown 117 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    between the principal, master or employer and the husband as head and master of the community, and held that a husband, as head and master of the community, is liable for the tortious acts of his wife only when it is affirmatively established that the wife was expressly or impliedly authorized and was acting in the service of the community, citing Adams v. Golson, supra; Tuck v. Harmon, La.App., ; Wise v. Smith, La.App., 186 So.
  • Johnson v. Delta Fire & Casualty Co. 110 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    Tuck v. Harmon, La.App., ; Wise v. Smith, La.App., 186 So.
  • Hart v. Hardgrave 103 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    Adams v. Golson, supra; Tuck v. Harmon, La.App., ; Wise v. Smith, La.
  • Howard v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 70 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Tuck v. Harmon, La.App., ; Wise v. Smith, La.App., 186 So.
  • Addison v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Wis. 64 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    62 ; Tuck v. Harmon, La.App., ; Robbins v. Short, La.App., 165 So.
  • Mock v. Maryland Casualty Co. 6 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    62 ; Tuck v. Harmon, La.App., ; Robbins v. Short, La.App., 165 So.
  • Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Simms 200 So. 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    Tuck v. Harmon, La.App., ; Wise v. Smith, La.App., 186 So.
  • Wise v. Smith 186 So. 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    In holding that the action of a wife in going out to bring in some distressed friends of her husband who had phoned in to request that he come out to drive them in to Monroe, , 804: “Nor could Harmon be held on the merits.
  • Graham v. American Employers' Ins. Co. of Boston 171 So. 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
  • Adams v. Golson 171 So. 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    and discharged the husband from liability on a showing that at the time of the accident complained of his wife was using the automobile without his knowledge, he being absent at the time, in Tendering assistance to friends who were having trouble on the road and who had ’phoned his house asking that he drive ou
  • Tuck v. Harmon 151 So. 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934