No. 4580 Precedential Processed

Clemens v. Testard

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed November 9, 1909 · 6 Teiss. 177

Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 28, 1974 297 So. 2d 229; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 4, 1972 261 So. 2d 269; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 17, 1958 101 So. 2d 734; La., March 15, 1873 25 La. Ann. 220

Opinion text

ESTOPINAL, J. The motion herein fails to comply with the rules of this Court in that it was not “accompanied by three copies of a written or printed brief which has been served upon the opposing counsel. Under the circumstances we shall not pass on the motion jin limine, but shall consider it when the tease is heard on the merits. The motion is therefore denied without prejudice.