No. 4623
Precedential
Processed
N. O. Lighting Co. v. Leitz
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 28, 1974 297 So. 2d 252; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 26, 1958 103 So. 2d 292; La., January 15, 1874 26 La. Ann. 22
N. O. Lighting Co. v. Leitz, 6 Teiss. 143 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1909).
Opinion text
DUFOUR J. The motion herein fails to comply with Rule 9, of this Court, in that it was not ‘ ‘ accompanied b.y three copies, of a written or printed brief which has been served upon the opposite counsel.” Under the circumstances we shall not pass on it, in limns, but shall consider it when the cause is submitted on the merits. The motion is denied without prejudice.