Acosta v. Department of Highways
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., September 11, 1974 300 So. 2d 647; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 8, 1909 6 Teiss. 222
Acosta v. Department of Highways, 266 So. 2d 924 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972).
The holding in the court’s own words
For the reasons expressed in the opinion in that case, we conclude that the judgment against the Louisiana State Department of Highways should be affirmed.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- LeBlanc v. Estate of Blanchard 266 So. 2d 918
Opinion text
LEMMON, Judge. This case was consolidated for trial and on appeal with LeBlanc et al. v. Estate of Blanchard et al., 266 So.2d 918 , No. 4641 on the docket of this court. For the reasons expressed in the opinion in that case, we conclude that the judgment against the Louisiana State Department of Highways should be affirmed. Since the plaintiffs did not appeal or answer the appeal, the contentions in their brief relating to an increase in the amount of award cannot be considered. Affirmed.