DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Calhoon v. Meridian Lumber Co., 151 So. 778.

13 citing documents.

  • Nixon v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company 161 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    2 Cir., ; Reed v. Calcasieu Paper Company, 233 La.
  • Childers v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. 171 So. 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    412 , which was first decided by this court ( ), and subsequently reviewed by the Supreme Court.
  • Custer v. New Orleans Paper Box Factory, Inc. 170 So. 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
  • McGruder v. Service Drayage Co. 162 So. 806 La. 1935
  • Barr v. United Gas Public Service Co. 162 So. 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
  • Barr v. Davis Bros. Lumber Co. 161 So. 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
  • Brown v. N. O. Compress Co. 160 So. 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    In our opinion the quoted section of Justice Brunot’s opinion is an inadvertence because in the Calhoon Case there was a claim for compensation under the general disability subsections, at least in the appellate court, as appears from the opinion in that case written by Judge Mills of the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit ( ).
  • Hill v. National Life Accident Ins. Co. 160 So. 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    wherein it was held, quoting syllabus: “That employee’s capacity to work is affected by injury does not render inapplicable provisions of act allowing fixed compensation for specific losses and bring case under- provisions covering general disability, since em- *315 ployée cannot suffer specific loss without ca
  • McGruder v. Service Drayage Co. 158 So. 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
  • Holliman v. Southern Kraft Corporation 157 So. 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
  • Jones v. Southern Advance Bag & Paper Co. 157 So. 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
    8, 14, 15, as amended).” This court, in Calhoon v. Meridian Lumber Co., reported in , had occasion to thoroughly consider the principle discussed and passed upon in the Wilson Case, and we reached a different conclusion on the legal question involved.
  • Calhoon v. Meridian Lumber Co. 156 So. 412 La. 1934
  • Bell v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corporation 152 So. 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
    After this matter had been submitted, our attention was called to a decision rendered on January 3, 1934, , in which it was held: “That employee’s capacity to work is affected by injury does not render inapplicable provisions of act allowing fixed compensation for specific losses and bring case under provisions covering general disability.