State Ex Rel. Rothrock v. Webber
Also decided on this docket: La., October 10, 1963 156 So. 2d 607
State Ex Rel. Rothrock v. Webber, 161 So. 2d 759 (La. 1964).
Cited by
- Powell v. Barsavage 399 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
- Duffie v. Duffie 387 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- In the Interest of Edler 382 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- Tolar v. Cunningham 368 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
- State ex rel. Rotolo 361 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1978
- State in Interest of Taylor 296 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
- Wood v. Beard 290 So. 2d 675 La. 1974
- Borras v. Falgoust 285 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
- Lindsay v. Finch 240 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- State Ex Rel. Stokes v. Stokes 222 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- State ex rel. Tusa v. Tusa 221 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- In Re State Ex Rel. Thaxton 220 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State Ex Rel. Deason v. McWilliams 227 La. 957
- State Ex Rel. Paul v. Peniston 235 La. 579
Opinion text
HAWTHORNE, Justice (dissenting). It is my view that the natural parents of the child here involved should be denied her custody under the holding of this court in State ex rel. Deason v. McWilliams, 227 La. 957 , 81 So.2d 8 , and State ex rel. Paul v. Peniston, 235 La. 579 , 105 So.2d 228 . The Court of Appeal relied on these two cases . in denying to the natural parents custody *926 in this case. I am in full accord with the view expressed by that court, see La.App., 1SS So.2d 763, and think its judgment should' be affirmed.