Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Foret, 157 So. 2d 733.
-
State v. Sutton
374 So. 2d 1218
La. 1979
(1963), this Court refused to consider an application of the defendant which was filed twenty-two days after the original time period despite the fact that the trial court had suspended execution of its judgment nine days after the original time delay in order for the defendant to take writs.
- State v. Mandino 352 So. 2d 233 La. 1977
-
State v. Landry
339 So. 2d 8
La. 1976
The defendant argues that because the time within which the State was granted to apply for writs has expired, the State no longer has a right of review by writ application, , (1963).
-
State v. Lobue
273 So. 2d 508
La. 1973
70 , (1963); , (1963), and City of Baton Rouge v. Van Valkenburg, 259 La.
- State v. Normand 242 So. 2d 245 La. 1971
- State v. Coleman 209 So. 2d 741 La. 1968
- State v. Laviolette 195 So. 2d 270 La. 1967
-
State v. Wyche
191 So. 2d 496
La. 1966
70 , ; , ; and State v. Green, 245 La.
- State v. Wyche 190 So. 2d 915 La. 1966
-
State v. Polland
174 So. 2d 132
La. 1965
70 , , , ; and State v. Green et al., 245 La.
-
State v. Bradford
174 So. 2d 132
La. 1965
70 , , , ; and State v. Green et al., 245 La.
-
State v. Amos
174 So. 2d 132
La. 1965
70 , , , ; and State v. Green et al., 245 La.
-
State v. Spivey
174 So. 2d 132
La. 1965
70 , , , ; and State v. Green et al., 245 La.
- State v. Green 162 So. 2d 573 La. 1964
- State v. Green 162 So. 2d 574 La. 1964
- State v. Green 162 So. 2d 574 La. 1964
- State v. Green 162 So. 2d 573 La. 1964