DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Preston, 103 So. 3d 525.

21 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. David W. Lupton, III La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Randle James Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Delon Quinell Swafford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Jameel D. Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. James Daniel Johnson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
  • State Of Louisiana v. Jonathan Luper La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    11 App. 2d Cir. 8/ 8/ 12), - 32 ( defendant' s prior conviction for unauthorized entry into the home of a 13 -year-old girl was admissible in sexual battery prosecution as an integral part of the prior offense to prove defendant' s lustful disposition toward children); State v. Hotard, 2007- 0498, pp. 4- 7 ( La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Katron v. Richard A/K/A Katron Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    2 Cir. 8/8/12), the trial court incorrectly stated that the defendant’s sentencing range was six to twenty years imprisonment when in reality the range was three and a third to ten years.
  • State v. Katron 265 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    2 Cir. 8/8/12), , the trial court incorrectly stated that the defendant's sentencing range was six to twenty years imprisonment when in reality the range was three and a third to ten years.
  • State v. Kurz 245 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Griffin 243 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Berry 221 So. 3d 967 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Blake Allen Shell -Aka- Blake A. Shell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    2 Cir. 8/8/12), (wherein the second circuit affirmed a defendant‟s sentence as it was within the correct sentencing guidelines, although the trial court incorrectly identified the applicable sentencing guidelines; the second circuit identified no intention of the trial court to impose a more lenient sentence).
  • State v. Shell 216 So. 3d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    2 Cir. 8/8/12), (wherein the second circuit affirmed a defendant’s sentence as it was within the correct sentencing guidelines, although the trial court incorrectly identified the applicable sentencing guidelines; the second circuit identified no intention of the trial court to impose a more lenient sentence).
  • State v. Scott 209 So. 3d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Dale 180 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Bell 179 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v, Preston, 47,273 (La.App.2d Cir.8/8/12), , citing State v. Scales, 93-2003 (La.5/22/95), , cert.
  • State v. Johnson 175 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Breaux 171 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Jackson 132 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Preston, 47,273 (La.App.2d Cir.8/8/12), ; State v. Gardner, 46,688 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
  • State v. Davis 128 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Contrarily, in State v. Preston, 47,273 (La.App.2d Cir.8/8/12), , the trial court incorrectly stated that the defendant’s sentencing range was six to 20 years’ imprisonment, when in reality the range was 3.33 to 10 years.
  • State v. Moran 135 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Preston, 47,-273 (La.App.2d Cir.8/8/12), .