Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Goosby, 111 So. 3d 494.
-
State of Louisiana v. Carlos M. Smith
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
App. 2 Cir. 3/6/13), writ denied, 13-0760 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jason Ray Craft
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
2 Cir. 3/6/13), writ denied, 13-760 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Chad Lightfoot
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 2 Cir. 3/6/13), (trial court’s failure to strictly comply with the provisions of La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Emilio Taylor
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
App. 2 Cir. 3/6/13), writ denied, 13-0760 (La.
-
State v. Lynn
251 So. 3d 1262
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
App. 2 Cir. 3/6/13), , writ denied , 13-0760 (La.
-
State v. Nicholas
196 So. 3d 864
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2 Cir. 3/6/13), , writ denied, 13-760 (La.11/1/13), (where the appellate court found that the State presented competent evidence at the habitual offender hearing and that no reversible error occurred when the trial court failed to advise the defendant of his right to remain silent)
-
State v. Williams
178 So. 3d 1051
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
See State v. Robinson, supra; State v. Goosby, 47,772 (La.App.2d Cir.3/6/13), , writ denied, 2013-0760 (La.11/1/13), (noting that this court has held that the burden of proof of self-defense in a non-homicide case rests upon the defendant.
-
State v. Roland
162 So. 3d 558
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Goosby, 47,772 (La.App.2d Cir.3/6/13), , writ denied, 2013-0760 (La.11/1/13), .
-
Explained
State v. Franklin
142 So. 3d 295
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2 Cir. 3/6/13); , writ denied, 13-760 (La.11/1/13); , Spoliation creates a presumption that the evidence was destroyed because it would have been detrimental to one’s case.
- State of Louisiana v. Michael Dennis Grant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
-
State of Louisiana v. Justin Robert Sizemore
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2 Cir. 3/6/13), writ denied, 13-760 (La.
-
State v. Sizemore
129 So. 3d 860
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2 Cir. 3/6/13) , , writ denied, 13-760 (La.11/1/13), .
-
State v. Augustine
131 So. 3d 109
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2 Cir. 3/6/13), (threatening juveniles had retreated and defendant was no longer in imminent peril of great bodily harm).
- State v. Crossley 117 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013