Leggio v. Broussard
Leggio v. Broussard, 163 So. 2d 356 (La. 1964).
Cited by
- Debrun v. Tumbleweeds Gymnastics, Inc. 900 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
- Hutchinson v. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, NO. 5747 866 So. 2d 228 La. 2004
- Harvey ex rel. Bates v. T.H.E. Insurance 764 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. 516 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
- Rivere v. Thunderbird, Inc. 353 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
- Kidder v. Anderson 345 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Levy v. Duclaux 324 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
- Durand v. United Dollar Store of Hammond, Inc. 242 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Leggio v. Broussard 162 So. 2d 23
- Dobson v. Standard Accident Insurance Company 228 La. 837
Opinion text
In re: A. B. Broussard, Jr., A. B. Brous-sard and Sons, Inc., and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 162 So.2d 23 . Writ refused. According to the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no merit in the assignment of error. McCALEB, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted as this case is one exclusively cognizable under the Employers Liability Act. See Dobson v. Standard Accident Ins. Co., 228 La. 837 , 84 So.2d 210 — As a tort action, no recovery should be had as plaintiff assumed the risk of injury as operator of the tractor under the circumstances presented.