No. 47357
Precedential
Processed
Durham v. Paciera
Durham v. Paciera, 165 So. 2d 486 (La. 1964).
Cited by
- Liedtke v. Allstate Ins. Co. 405 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
- Venterella v. Pace 180 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Durham v. Paciera 164 So. 2d 188
Opinion text
In re: Pete Durham, individually, and as the administrator of the estate of his son, Michael Durham, et al. Opinion of Court of Appeals, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, reported at 164 So.2d 188 . The application is denied. According to the facts of the case, as found by the Court of Appeal, the judgment complained of is correct.