DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Danna v. Yazoo M v. R. Co., 154 So. 365.

17 citing documents.

  • Favrot v. Favrot 210 So. 2d 316 La. 1968
    713 , ; Danna v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co., La.App., ; and Cavalier v. LaSalle, La.
  • Langston v. Willis 179 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 174 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    2 Cir., 1937); Danna v. Yazoo & (La.App.
  • Thompson v. Madden 106 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Danna v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co., La.App., ; Varnell v. Babin, La.App., ; Johnson v. Louisville Fire & Marine Ins.
  • Loe v. Whitman 87 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Danna v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co., La.App., ; Varnell v. Babin, La.App., ; Johnson v. Louisville Fire & Marine Ins.
  • Three Way Finance Co. v. Callendar 84 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    The identical point here at issue has been several times decided by this court; Danna v. Yazoo & ; ; Johnson v. Louisville Fire & Marine Ins.
  • Poole v. Whitman 83 So. 2d 641 La. 1955
    The respondents rely on the language used in the case of Danna v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co., La.App., , to the effect that under the authority of Article 7, Section 28 of the Constitution of Louisiana, LSA, Rule 3 of the Court of Appeal was adopted, prohibiting the clerk "from’ filing á transcript until the filing ’fee'-’is' paid.
  • Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Dykes 50 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    The motion tenders the identical issue that was tendered in the following cases before this Court, viz.: Danna v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co., La.App., ; Varnell v. Babin, La.App., ; Johnson v. Louisville Fire & Marine Insurance Co., La.App., .
  • Johnson v. Louisville Fire & Marine Ins. 49 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    The identical question here tendered has been passed upon by this Court in two cases, viz: Varnell et al. v. Babin, La.App., , and Danna v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Company et al, La.App., .
  • Osborne v. Mossler Acceptance Corporation 24 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
  • Varnell v. Babin 13 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
    Co. et al., La.App., reported in , wherein, as reflected from the syllabus, this court held: "Where deposit for filing of transcript in appellate court is made subsequent to expiration of return day and grace period, transcript filed thereafter is not timely filed though it may have been actually received by clerk prior to expiration of return day, s
  • Carter v. Chambers 5 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    Company et al., La.App., , although the record timely reached this court, the appeal was dismissed because the filing fee was not advanced prior to return day nor within three days thereafter.
  • Riggs v. F. Strauss Son 2 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    Railroad Company, La.App., ; Dorfer v. City of Natchitoches, La.App., 160 So.
  • Twin City Motor Co. v. Pettit 177 So. 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    Rule 3; see Danna v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad Company, La.App., .
  • Mansaur v. Anding 171 So. 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
  • Sanders v. Wyatt 170 So. 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
  • Dorfer v. City of Natchitoches 160 So. 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    Co., , where the record was lodged in this court before the expiration of the return day, but the filing fee was not paid until after that period for the reason that, though physically in this court before the return day, under the provisions of rule 3 the record was not legally filed until after its expiration.