State v. George
Also decided on this docket: La., January 18, 1965 170 So. 2d 861
State v. George, 167 So. 2d 677 (La. 1964).
Cited by
- Calcasieu Marine National Bank of Lake Charles v. Scarlett Investments 556 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Pontchartrain State Bank v. Gross 508 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
- Texas Bank of Beaumont v. Bozorg 444 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
- People's Bank & Trust Co. v. Campbell 374 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
- Franklin v. BRIDGES LOAN & INVESTMENT CO., INC. 371 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
- Acadiana Bank v. Foreman 343 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
- Richey v. Venture Oil & Gas Corp. 346 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
- Cameron Brown South, Inc. v. East Glen Oaks, Inc. 341 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
- Thrift Funds Canal, Inc. v. Foy 260 So. 2d 628 La. 1972
Opinion text
In re: Pearl Lee George applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition. The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having- been duly considered, It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable C. A. Barnett, Judge of the 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 18th day of December, 1964, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator here *867 in, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained. It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through its attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.