DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc., 154 So. 507.

18 citing documents.

  • O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc. 758 So. 2d 124 La. 2000
    2 Cir.1940); Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc., (La.App.
  • O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc. 737 So. 2d 31 La. 1999
    2 Cir.1940) and Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc., (La.App.
  • Ellis v. Normal Life of Louisiana 638 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    1st Cir.1993), [Heart attack], Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc., (La.App.
  • Swilley v. Sun Oil Co. 506 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • Alexander v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HWYS. 347 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    See Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc., supra [La.App., ].
  • Samson v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 205 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller Inc., La.App., , involved an instance in which an employee sought compensation for disability resulting from a lung infection reputedly caused by inhaling paint fumes.
  • Hawkins v. Employers Casualty Company 177 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    2 Cir., ; and Clark v. Southern Kraft Corp., La.App.
  • Wiltz v. Esso Standard Oil Co. 126 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Plaintiff in this suit relies on the case of Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, La.App., , as authority for the proposition that the allegations of his petition set forth a cause of action.
  • Atchison v. May 10 So. 2d 785 La. 1942
    596 ; Faulkner v. Miller-Fuller Inc., La.App., , and Clark v. Southern Kraft Corporation, La.App., 200 So.
  • Clark v. Southern Kraft Corporation 200 So. 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    The case of Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc., La.App., , is relied on by plaintiff, while defendant relies upon Jackson v. Southern Kraft Corporation, La.App., 183 So.
  • Searcy v. Novo 188 So. 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    Article 419, Code of Practice; Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc., La.App., ; and cases therein cited; also Commercial National Bank v. Smith, 150 La.
  • Jackson v. Southern Kraft Corporation 183 So. 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    406 ; Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc., La.App., ; McLain v. N. O. Public Service, Inc., 12 La.App.
  • Salter v. Walsworth 167 So. 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    Eames v. Alexandria Contracting Co. (La.App.)
  • Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New York 168 So. 488 La. 1936
    510 ; Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller (La.App.1934) ; Penton v. Fisher (La.App.1934) 155 So.
  • Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Burch 166 So. 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    In the case of Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Incorporated, , this court held that an amended petition filed after the trial of an exception of no cause of action, but before a ruling had been made thereon by the court, the ruling must be determined by considering the contents of both the original and amended petitions.
  • Drewett v. Carnahan 165 So. 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
  • Freiss v. Lone Star Cement Co. 161 So. 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    App.) ; Dewey v. Lutcher-Moore Lumber Co., 151 La.
  • Eames v. Alexandria Contracting Co. 154 So. 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
    Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc. et al., , this day decided by this court.