Spencer v. Traders & General Insurance
Spencer v. Traders & General Insurance, 173 So. 2d 541 (La. 1965).
Cited by
- State, Department of Highways v. Osbon 292 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
- State, Through Department of Highways v. Hoyt 284 So. 2d 763 La. 1973
- State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Entre Nous, Inc. 283 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- State, Department of Highways v. Daigle 278 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
- State, Department of Highways v. Hoyt 272 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Stegemann 269 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
- State, Department of Highways v. Mertens 271 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
- State, Department of Highways v. Smith 272 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Spencer v. Traders & General Insurance Company 171 So. 2d 723
- Fullilove v. US Casualty Company of New York 240 La. 859
Opinion text
In re: Bessie Spencer and Leon Rhodes applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 171 So.2d 723, 727 . Writ refused. The judgment complained of is correct. SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted. He is of the opinion that a genuine issue of fact is presented as to whether the automobile was a temporary substitute automobile as defined in the policy. See Fullilove v. United States Casualty Co., 240 La. 859 , 125 So.2d 389 . The exclusion of automobiles owned by relatives and members of same household does not apply to temporary substitute automobiles. The case should be advanced to trial. •