Pelloat v. Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission
Pelloat v. Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission, 176 So. 2d 452 (La. 1965).
Cited by
- Marcile v. Dauzat 103 So. 3d 335 La. 2012
- Blanchard v. City Parish of East Baton Rouge 674 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- Adams v. City of Baton Rouge 673 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- Heindel v. Harley-Davidson Motorcycles 467 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
- West v. STATE, THROUGH SUP. OF PUB. ED. ETC. 356 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Carter v. City of New Orleans 327 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
- Society To Oppose Pornography, Inc. v. Thevis 273 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Leger ex rel. Leger v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 265 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- City of Houma v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 231 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Frugé 201 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Pelloat v. Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission 175 So. 2d 656
Opinion text
In re: Jacque Pelloat, Jr., et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Tammany. 175 So.2d 656 . Writ not considered. Since the Court of Appeal, after granting a writ of certiorari, disposed of the questions presented following a hearing on a rule nisi, its judgment thereon was a final adjudication. In view of this, applicants’ exclusive remedy for review by this Court was by certiorari under Section 11 of Art. VII of the Constitution. (See also Art. 2167 C.C.P.) However, we cannot consider an application under the Constitutional provision unless the aggrieved party has heretofore applied for a rehearing in the Court of Appeal and such application has been denied by that Court. These procedural prerequisites have not *123 been taken in this matter. The provisions of Rule IX, Section 4 of the Uniform Rules ■of the Courts of Appeal, cited by applicants are not applicable to the situation presented here.