State ex rel. Williams
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 8, 1971 254 So. 2d 662; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 27, 1959 111 So. 2d 540; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 13, 1909 7 Teiss. 73; La., January 15, 1874 26 La. Ann. 59
State ex rel. Williams, 300 So. 2d 858 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974).
Cited by
- Mark Stephen Jaskot and Diane M. Robertson Jaskot v. Lyle K. Doublet and Riverside … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
- Ryan v. Case New Holland, Inc. 211 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
- Royal v. Cook 984 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- Agee v. Speers 803 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- Fly v. Allstar Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. 690 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- Cornelious v. Bailey Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. 566 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Bell v. Battles 532 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Truelove v. Easley 521 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- T & J Trucking Co. v. Day Motors, Inc. 518 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Robert v. Bayou Bernard Marine, Inc. 514 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- Webb v. Polk Chevrolet, Inc. 509 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Coffey v. Cournoyer Oldsmobile-Cadillac-GMC, Inc. 484 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Opinion text
ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL MILLER, Judge. The defendant-appellant, Mark Wayne Williams, moves to dismiss his unlodged appeal from the Fourteenth Judicial District Court. The motion is unopposed. We dismiss. Rule VII, Section 3, paragraph 2 of the Uniform Rules — Courts of Appeal provides as follows: “In the absence of a timely answer to the appeal or other formal action to amend or modify the judgment appealed, the appellant alone may, by his formal motion to dismiss, on leave of the court, forthwith abandon his appeal and obtain its dismissal.” There being no objection to the Motion to Dismiss, the appeal is hereby dismissed at mover’s cost. Appeal dismissed.