No. 47975
Precedential
Processed
Acosta v. Cole
Acosta v. Cole, 179 So. 2d 274 (La. 1965).
Cited by
- Greater Lafourche Port Commission v. James Construction Group, L.L.C. 104 So. 3d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- Lingoni v. Hibernia National Bank 33 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Dumas and Associates, Inc. v. Lewis Enterprises Inc. 704 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- Colbert v. BF Carvin Const. Co. 600 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
- McKeen Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Oliver 586 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Revel v. Telecheck Louisiana 581 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Conmaco, Inc. v. Southern Ocean Corp. 581 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Laprarie v. King 575 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Carter v. Deitz 556 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Morrison v. JA Jones Const. Co., Inc. 537 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- Gullo v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 535 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Lewis v. Modular Quarters 508 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Acosta v. Cole 178 So. 2d 456
Opinion text
In re: Cullen E. Cole and Ethel R. Cole applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 178 So.2d 456 . Writ refused. Under the facts of this case the result reached by the Court of Appeal is correct. McCALEB, J., thinks that a writ should be granted.