No. 48041
Precedential
Processed
Pflieger v. Haws
Pflieger v. Haws, 182 So. 2d 661 (La. 1966).
Cited by
- Eitmann v. West 411 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
- Daniels v. Conn 382 So. 2d 945 La. 1980
- Hryhorchuk v. Smith 379 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
- Ogden v. Smith 344 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
- Becnel v. Ward 286 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
- Louisiana Power & Light Company v. CHURCHILL FARMS, INC. 292 So. 2d 183 La. 1974
- Canter v. Koehring Company 283 So. 2d 716 La. 1973
- Badeaux v. Patterson Truck Line, Inc. 247 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
- Rollins v. New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc. 225 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Opinion text
SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted. The Workmen’s Compensation Act does not classify a fellow employee as a third party who is subject to suit in tort and the Court of Appeal decisions to that effect should be reviewed. See Sec. 366, Malone, Workmen’s Compensation.