No. 48150
Precedential
Processed
Victory Oil Co. v. Perret
Victory Oil Co. v. Perret, 184 So. 2d 735 (La. 1966).
Cited by
Distinguished in 1
- In re Tedeton 243 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
- In Re Succession of White 961 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- Morris & Dickson Co. v. Jones Brothers Co., Inc. 691 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- Weatherford v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 637 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Conmaco, Inc. v. Southern Ocean Corp. 581 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Hendry v. Succession of Helms 557 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Idacon, Inc. v. Arnold Construction Co. 537 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- McDermott, Inc. v. M-Elec. & Const. Co., Inc. 496 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
- Perkins v. O'Neal's Feeders Supply, Inc. 463 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Super v. Burke 367 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
- Efferson v. Laurie 354 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Maus v. Schouest 342 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Victory Oil Company v. Perret 183 So. 2d 360
Opinion text
In re: Victory Oil Company, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Charles. 183 So.2d 360 . Writ refused. Judgment not final. McCALEB, J., concurs, being of the view that the claim in reconvention, even if prescribed, may be asserted as an offset to plaintiff’s demand, for a party may always employ a connected claim as a defense although he might otherwise he barred from recovery had he instituted the action. See Art. 424, C.C.P.