Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Young, 193 So. 2d 243.

15 citing documents.

  • State ex rel. Claiborne 535 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Neal 500 So. 2d 374 La. 1987
    1975); , (1966); State v. Bonanno, 245 La.
  • State ex rel. Quatrevingt 393 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • State v. Phillips 365 So. 2d 1304 La. 1978
    See: , concurring opinion [1] (La.1975); , (1966) [2] ; State v. Bonanno, 245 La.
  • State v. Babin 319 So. 2d 367 La. 1975
    705 , (1967) (syllabus 3); , (1966) (syllabus 1); State v. Cooper, 249 La.
  • State v. Lindsey 310 So. 2d 89 La. 1975
    963 (1914), or to oral-genital sexual activity, , 193 So.
  • State v. McKinney 302 So. 2d 917 La. 1974
    827 , (1968); , (1966); State v. Brown, 248 La.
  • State v. Cryer 263 So. 2d 895 La. 1972
  • State v. Gladden 257 So. 2d 388 La. 1972
    705 , (1967); , (1967); State v. Cooper, 249 La.
  • State v. Shaffer 257 So. 2d 121 La. 1971
    705 , ; , ; State v. Cooper, 249 La.
  • State v. Frank 244 So. 2d 830 La. 1971
    this Court said: “It is well settled in the jurisprudence of this court that the bill of exception must show not only the objection but also the ground of objection, so that the trial judge may be afforded an opportunity to rule intelligently on the *832 admissibility of the offering or testimony obj
  • State v. Nails 234 So. 2d 184 La. 1970
    2d 86 ; , ; State v. Martin, 250 La.
  • State v. Whitfield 219 So. 2d 493 La. 1969
  • State v. Manuel 217 So. 2d 369 La. 1968
  • State v. Bonner 210 So. 2d 319 La. 1968
    * * *” , , wherein defense counsel sought to obtain oyer of the police officer’s prior written report, stating to the court that he wanted it for the purpose of “traversing it, testing his credibility and memory.” Like the instant matter, that case involved the officer’s report of statements made to him b