Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Young, 193 So. 2d 243.
- State ex rel. Claiborne 535 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
State v. Neal
500 So. 2d 374
La. 1987
1975); , (1966); State v. Bonanno, 245 La.
- State ex rel. Quatrevingt 393 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
-
State v. Phillips
365 So. 2d 1304
La. 1978
See: , concurring opinion [1] (La.1975); , (1966) [2] ; State v. Bonanno, 245 La.
-
State v. Babin
319 So. 2d 367
La. 1975
705 , (1967) (syllabus 3); , (1966) (syllabus 1); State v. Cooper, 249 La.
-
State v. Lindsey
310 So. 2d 89
La. 1975
963 (1914), or to oral-genital sexual activity, , 193 So.
-
State v. McKinney
302 So. 2d 917
La. 1974
827 , (1968); , (1966); State v. Brown, 248 La.
- State v. Cryer 263 So. 2d 895 La. 1972
-
State v. Gladden
257 So. 2d 388
La. 1972
705 , (1967); , (1967); State v. Cooper, 249 La.
-
State v. Shaffer
257 So. 2d 121
La. 1971
705 , ; , ; State v. Cooper, 249 La.
-
State v. Frank
244 So. 2d 830
La. 1971
this Court said: “It is well settled in the jurisprudence of this court that the bill of exception must show not only the objection but also the ground of objection, so that the trial judge may be afforded an opportunity to rule intelligently on the *832 admissibility of the offering or testimony obj
-
State v. Nails
234 So. 2d 184
La. 1970
2d 86 ; , ; State v. Martin, 250 La.
- State v. Whitfield 219 So. 2d 493 La. 1969
- State v. Manuel 217 So. 2d 369 La. 1968
-
State v. Bonner
210 So. 2d 319
La. 1968
* * *” , , wherein defense counsel sought to obtain oyer of the police officer’s prior written report, stating to the court that he wanted it for the purpose of “traversing it, testing his credibility and memory.” Like the instant matter, that case involved the officer’s report of statements made to him b