No. 48428
Precedential
Processed
Pittman v. Davidge
Pittman v. Davidge, 191 So. 2d 143 (La. 1966).
Cited by
- Heritage Worldwide, Inc. v. Jimmy Swaggart Ministries 665 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Williamson 585 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- River Road Const., Inc. v. Canal Indem. Co. 538 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Stafford v. Unsell 492 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Alexander v. Burroughs Corp. 359 So. 2d 607 La. 1978
- Davis v. Smith 330 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
- Wurzlow v. Placid Oil Company 279 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Irby Steel v. W. R. Fairchild Construction Co. 270 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Barnett v. Barnett Enterprises, Inc. 231 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Nugent v. Downs 230 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
- Compass v. Department of Highways 224 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- Bazanac v. State ex rel. Department of Highways 218 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Pittman and Matheny v. Davidge 189 So. 2d 706
Opinion text
In re: Pittman and Matheny applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 189 So.2d 706 . *769 Writ refused. We find no merit in any of the errors complained of. FOURNET, C. J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. This court should not close its eyes to judgments with obvious erroneous or illegal awards. SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion a writ should be granted.