State v. Singleton
State v. Singleton, 204 So. 2d 293 (La. 1967).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Robinson 244 La. 199
- State v. May 239 La. 1069
- State v. Richard 230 La. 853
- State v. Ware 228 La. 713
- State v. Perez 84 So. 2d 195
- State v. Honeycutt 218 La. 362
- State v. Roy 217 La. 1074
- State v. Dartez 222 La. 9
Opinion text
FOURNET, Chief Justice. The defendant, James Valentine Singleton, subsequent to his conviction for pandering in violation of R.S. 14:84 and sentence to serve one year in jail following denial of a motion for a new trial, appealed without perfecting any bills of exception; hence, there is nothing for us to review save and except such errors that appear patent on the face of the record, 1 and finding none, the conviction and sentence are affirmed. . State v. Robinson, 244 La. 199 , 151 So.2d 371 : State v. May, 239 La. 1069 , 121 So.2d 82 ; State v. Richard, 230 La. 853 , 89 So.2d 367 ; State v. Ware, 228 La. 713 , 84 So.2d 56 ; State v. Perez, 228 . La. 796, 84 So.2d 195 ; State v. Honey.cutt, 218 La. 362 , 49 So.2d 610 ; State v. Roy, 217 La. 1074 , 47 So.2d 915 ; State v. Dartez, 222 La. 9 , 62 So.2d 83 and numerous cases cited therein.