DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bruce v. Simonson Investments, Inc., 207 So. 2d 360.

12 citing documents.

  • Bruce Childers v. Laurel Lake Estates Homeowners Association, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
    Childers countered that pursuant to Bruce v. Simonson Investments, Inc., 207 So.
  • Lakewood Property Owners' Ass'n v. Kyle 183 So. 3d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See also Comment (d) (citing Gerde v. Simonson Investments, Inc., 251 La., 893 , (1968); Salerno v. DeLucca, 211 La.
  • Diefenthal v. Longue Vue Foundation 865 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    (citing Bruce v. Simonson Investments, Inc., , (1968)).
  • INVESTMENT MGMT. SVCS., INC. v. Village of Folsom 808 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4th Cir.1967), affirmed, , (1968), where the appellate court found a recordation of protective covenants in the conveyance records did not constitute a "violation" for purposes of commencement of the two-year prescriptive period.
  • Brier Lake, Inc. v. Jones 710 So. 2d 1054 La. 1998
    As noted in the majority opinion at 1059, in Bruce v. Simonson Investments, Inc., , (1968) this Court stated: The release of such a servitude is a real alienation.
  • Perkins v. B & W CONTRACTORS, INC. 439 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    ERROR NO. 1 In this assignment of error appellants argue that "building restrictions are incorporeal immovables and real rights likened to predial servitudes," La.Civ.Code art. 777, and that the release of such a servitude is an alienation to which all owners must consent, citing Bruce v. Simonson Investments, Inc., , (1968).
  • Richard v. Broussard 378 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    See Gerde v. Simonson Investments, Inc., , (1968); Salerno v. DeLucca, 211 La.
  • Chapman v. Fisher 370 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Gerde v. Simonson Investments, Inc., , (1968); Salerno v. De Lucca, 211 La.
  • Hargroder v. City of Eunice 341 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    See also Bruce v. Simonson Investments, Inc., , (1968); Alfortish v. Wagner, 200 La.
  • Roccaforte v. Lewis 286 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    This tenet has been upheld as valid in Gerde v. Simonson Investments, Inc., , (1968).
  • Fitzwater v. Walker 281 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    While building restrictions have been considered a species of predial servitude, Bruce v. Simonson Investments, Inc., , (1968), building restrictions have been also judicially labeled from time to time as real obligations and covenants running with the land.
  • Robinson v. Morris 272 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    [See Bruce v. Simonson Investments, Inc., , (1968) and cases cited therein].