No. 48812
Precedential
Processed
Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing Corp.
Also decided on this docket: La., September 29, 1967 202 So. 2d 649
Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing Corp., 202 So. 2d 649 (La. 1967).
Cited by
Distinguished in 1
- Darlene Ward Pellecer, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Carlos F. … La. 2025
- In re J.E.T. 211 So. 3d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- Suprun v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 40 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Allstate Insurance v. Fred's, Inc. 33 So. 3d 976 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Fred's, Inc. 18 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
- Livingston Parish v. Millers Mut. Fire 767 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- Davis v. Burlingame 607 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- Lopez v. Chicago Bridge and Iron Co. 546 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- Chastant v. SBS-Harolyn Park Venture 510 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- Lieber v. Re Ownership of Real Property Located in Caddo Parish 501 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc. 500 So. 2d 748 La. 1987
- Stern v. Kreeger Store, Inc. 463 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing Corporation 199 So. 2d 210
Opinion text
In re: Inferno Manufacturing Corporation et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Lafourche. 199 So.2d 210 . Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment. HAMITER and McCALEB, JJ., are of the opinion that a writ should be granted limited to a consideration of quantum.