Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Crysel v. Gifford-Hill & Co., 158 So. 264.
-
George McGrew v. Quality Carriers, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Crysel v. Gifford Hill & Co., (La.App.
-
McGrew v. QUALITY CARRIERS, INC.
74 So. 3d 1253
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Crysel v. Gifford-Hill & Co., (La.App.
-
Blanchard v. Ogima
215 So. 2d 902
La. 1968
See also the following Court of Appeal cases: Crysel v. Gifford-Hill & Co., (La.App.
-
Henson v. Travelers Insurance Company
208 So. 2d 366
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
887 , 12 L.R.A.,N.S., 632; Crysel v. Gifford-Hill & Co., La.App., ; West Bros. v. Pierson, La.App., .'
-
Daves v. Hamilton
194 So. 2d 361
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
887 , 12 L.R.A., N.S., 632; Crysel v. Gifford-Hill & Co., La.App., ; West Bros. v. Pierson, La.App., .’ “Further, the owner is not responsible for any negligence of the independent contractor, Daroca v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
-
Crutti v. Frank
146 So. 2d 474
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
887 , 12 L.R.A.,N.S., 632; Crysel v. Gifford-Hill & Co., La.App., ; West Bros. v. Pierson, La.App., ."
-
Amyx v. Henry
69 So. 2d 69
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
379 ; Crysel v. Gifford-Hill Co., La.App.1935, .
-
Landry v. News-Star-World Pub. Corp.
46 So. 2d 140
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
887 , 12 L.R.A., N.S., 632; Crysel v. Gifford-Hill & Co., La.App., ; West Bros. v. Pierson, La.App., .
-
Lacaze v. Beeson
44 So. 2d 493
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
The plaintiff and the defendant cite, as correctly stating the test to be applied -in order to determine whether the relationship of-employer-employee or that of independent contractor exists in cases involving such a question, Crysel v. Gifford-Hill & Co., La.App., , and Ravare v. McCormick & Co., La.App., 166 So.
- Hanchey v. Consolidated Underwriters 43 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
-
De Cuers v. Crane Co.
40 So. 2d 61
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
App., ; West Bros. v. Pierson, La.
- Murphy v. Tremont Lumber Co. 22 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
-
Moore v. Cochran Franklin Co.
5 So. 2d 33
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
510 ; Crysel et al. v. Gifford-Hill Company, Inc., La.App., ; Merritt v. E.L.
-
Smith v. Howard Crumley & Co.
171 So. 188
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
App.) , finds application here.
-
Merritt v. E. L. Bruce Co.
166 So. 195
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
The case of Crysel v. Gifford-Hill & Co., , decided by this court, is cited and quoted from by counsel for all parties herein.