Hailey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Also decided on this docket: La., May 15, 1874 26 La. Ann. 470; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., June 20, 1972 265 So. 2d 352; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 1, 1960 118 So. 2d 500
Hailey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 311 So. 2d 542 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975).
Cited by
- Bell v. Crump 651 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- Concordia Bank & Trust Co. v. Webber 548 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Dane v. Doucet Bros. Const. Co., Inc. 396 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
- Abbadie's IGA Supermarket, Inc. v. Barousse 378 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
- United Credit Plan of Jena, Inc. v. Hailey 341 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- United Credit Plan of Jena, Inc. v. Hailey 311 So. 2d 539
Opinion text
FRUGÉ, Judge. This case was consolidated for trial with United Credit Plan of Jena, Inc. v. Hailey, 311 So.2d 539 (La.App. 3rd 1975). Plaintiff, Jean Hailey, was a passenger in the automobile driven by Sammie Hailey at the time of the accident in question. She sought recovery from Aetna Casualty and Surety Company for her personal injuries under the liability and uninsured motorist provisions of the policy issued to Sammie Hailey. The issue raised in this case is identical to the issue raised in the above cited case. For the reasons assigned in United Credit Plan of Jena, Inc. v. Hailey, supra, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the case is remanded for trial on the merits. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendant-appellee. Reversed and remanded.