Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Layne v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., 164 So. 672.

10 citing documents.

Kaylonna Dotson v. Darren Balsamo and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
2d 245 (1943), citing Layne v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., (La.
Raines v. Columbia Lakeland Medical Center 923 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Smith v. Quarles Drilling Co. 885 So. 2d 562 La. 2004
857 , (1943), citing Layne v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. , (La.App.
Preis v. Preis 664 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
After discussing authorities on the question of whether or not interest was due and whether or not a rehearing was necessary, the court concluded: Therefore, adopting and adhering to the procedure filed in the cases of Layne v. Louisiana Power and Light Company, [ (La.App.
Barker v. Howard Trucking, Inc. 458 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
2nd Cir.1935), modified on other grounds
Davis v. Le Blanc 149 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
2 Cir., ; Grennon v. New Orleans Public Service, 17 La.App.
Reeves v. State 80 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
Layne v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., La.App., .'" To the same effect is the holding in Grennon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 17 La.App.
Le Blanc v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 13 So. 2d 245 La. 1943
Layne v. Louisiana Power & Light Company et al. [La.App.], .” For the reasons assigned, the judgment is affirmed.
Le Blanc v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 8 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Layne v. Louisiana Power Light Company et al., La.App., .
Hollis v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 196 So. 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
511 ; Layne v. *379 Louisiana Power & Light Co., La.App., .