DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moreau v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 158 So. 412.

15 citing documents.

  • Sutton v. Rogers 222 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
    In an appropriate comment, this court stated, in Moreau v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., : "It is for this reason that a greater degree of care is required of them when children are seen along the road.
  • Bryan v. Durr 209 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    This case in turn derives its force from the earlier opinion in Moreau v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., (La.App.
  • Keller v. Louque 159 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    App., ; Moreau v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., La.App., .
  • Seale v. Checker Cab Company 137 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    In Moreau v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., Inc., La.App., , a 7½ year old child heedlessly ran across a country road from behind an automobile, but, notwithstanding this, the motorist was held guilty of negligence.
  • Walker v. Jarnevich 102 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    App., ; Brown v. Wade, La.
  • Jenkins v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, NJ 83 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
    548 , and Moreau v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., Inc., La.App., , with reference to the pronouncements in the said cases, respectively, that a motorist must operate his car so that children need not exercise the same care that is expected of adults, and that a tendency toward heedlessness on the part of children is well recognized and the knowledge thereof is imputed to all driver
  • Bechtold v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. 31 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., , both of which were decided by this *Page 897 court.
  • Stamps v. Henderson 25 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., , 414: "* * * In view of the degree of care required of him by the law in such a situation, he was at fault and negligent in starting forward before he was sure that the highway was clear and that all the children had passed.
  • Jamison v. State 7 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    506 , Moreau v. Southern Bell Telephone Telegraph Company, La.App., and Peperone v. Lee, La.App., 160 So.
  • Bodin v. Texas Co. 186 So. 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
  • Borman v. Lafargue 183 So. 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    Co., Inc., La.App., ; Cimo v. Karstendiek, La.App., 173 So.
  • Llorens v. McCann 175 So. 442 La. 1937
    790, 793 , and in Moreau v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., .
  • Brooks v. Labruyere 173 So. 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    Fontaine v. Dorsey, 15 La.App.
  • Kahn v. Shreveport Railways Co. 161 So. 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    App.) ; Ziegler v. Lamantia, 13 La.
  • Jacobs v. Williams 160 So. 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    App.) , except that the present case lacks the one essential element upon which liability was imposed in the Moreau Case, namely, the fact that defendant’s driver, having seen other children cross ahead of a stopped ear, should have anticipated the presence of one behind it.