Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thomas v. Kelley, 222 So. 2d 67.

34 citing documents.

Clarence Guidry v. City of Rayne Police Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Guidry v. City of Rayne Police Department 26 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir.), writ denied , (1969).
Kerrigan v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 748 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Kerrigan v. IMPERIAL FIRE AND CAS. INS. 748 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Sharbino v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 690 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
3 Cir.), writ denied, , (1969).
Uriegas v. Gainsco 663 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
3 Cir.), writ denied, , (1969).
Devereux v. Allstate Ins. Co. 557 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
3d Cir.1969), writ denied , (1969).
Slider v. Myers 557 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
3rd Cir.1969), writ denied , (1969).
STATE, DOTD v. Dietrich 544 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
STATE, DOTD v. Fakouri 541 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Burdin v. Board of Com'rs for Atchafalaya Basin Levee Dist. 533 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State, Dept. of Trans. & Dev. v. Sonnier 503 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
14 , (1969); (where large attorney's fees were granted in comparison to the award).
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANS. & DEVELOPMENT v. Jacob 491 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Redevelopment Agency for City of Alexandria v. Garrett 479 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1969), writs den., (La.
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT v. Shannon-Page Inv. Co. 478 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Finley v. North Assur. Co. of America 476 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
App.3d Cir.1969), writ refused, , (1983).
Thissel v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 476 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
3d Cir.1969), writ refused, points out that the rule that a night motorist has a duty to avoid striking objects in the road ahead is subject to the exception that he is not charged with the duty of guarding against striking an unexpected or unusual obstruction which is difficult to see and which he has no reason to anticipate he will
VALLEY ELEC. MEMBERSHIP CORP., INC. v. Wallace 465 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Gauthier v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 422 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
3rd Cir.1969), writ refused .
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS v. LeBlanc 388 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
State, Dept. of Transp. v. Van Willett 386 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
3rd Cir. 1969), writs den.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McInnis 360 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Harris v. Buck 351 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
STATE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS v. Romano 343 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Welch v. Mayhall 325 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
3rd Cir. 1969), writ refused, , ; (La.App.
State v. Wells 308 So. 2d 774 La. 1975
14 , (1969) ("* * * no error of law * * *.").
City of Baton Rouge v. Allied Chemical Corporation 308 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
State, Department of Highways v. Anselmo 301 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
14 , ; see also Tate, Legal Criteria of Damages and BenefitsThe Measurement of Taking-Caused Damages to Untaken Property, 1971, 31 La.L.Rev.
Baker v. Landry 286 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
3 Cir. 1969), writ refused , (1969) (La.App.
Greater Baton Rouge Airport District v. Carrick 258 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
14 , (1969), the trier of fact is not required to accept or to reject testimony of each expert witness in toto, but instead has the right to evaluate the weight to be given to the testimony of each witness in an expropriation case, and also has the right to make factual determinations as to which of the factors relied upon
Frank v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 254 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
The average motorist would not expect a pedestrian to exercise so little care for his own safety.” In the Calais case, supra, writs of certio-rari were denied by our Supreme Court, , , with a notation “On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.” It is apparent that the law stated in the Calais case is applicable here.
Collins Pipeline Company v. New Orleans East, Inc. 250 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
14 , (1969); Sterkx v. Gravity Drainage Dist.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Schexnaidre 247 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
14 , [1969] — writs denied): “Both parties contend that the trier of fact is not authorized to determine the severance damages in an amount to which no expert testified, by rejecting the precise amounts to which each expert had testified.
State v. Salassi 244 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971