No. 50,586-CA
Precedential
Processed
Schelmety v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA
Schelmety v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA, 193 So. 3d 194 (La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016).
Cited by
- Jeffrey Farshad v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company as partial subrogee of Tillman Carroll v. Ethan … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- Judy Maxie v. Annie Bates, Marlos Bates & Foremost Insurance Group La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
- Chreene v. Howard C. Prince, Jr. & Rowdy Adventures, L. L.C. 256 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
- Lewis v. GEICO Cas. Co. 246 So. 3d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Opinion text
BLEICH (Ad Hoc), J., concurring. |, Notwithstanding the location of this accident, a situation was created in which the insured would not be protected for, damages stemming from the use of the subject off-road vehicle unless the accident occurred within the curtilage of the home. From the standpoint of the insured, this is neither realistic nor sensible. To this extent, the applicable language of the subject policy is potentially misleading to an insured. However, despite this absence of more precise language in the subject policy, based on the well-reasoned analysis of the current jurisprudence by Chief Judge Brown, I concur.