Bockel v. Rudman
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 25, 1960 119 So. 2d 879; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., July 3, 1975 316 So. 2d 453; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., May 16, 1972 262 So. 2d 566
Bockel v. Rudman, 26 La. Ann. 208 (1874).
Opinion text
Wtlt, J. In this case the judge fixed no amount for an appeal *209 bond. A suspensive appeal was granted on appellants giving bond conditioned according to law. The amount of the appeal bond is not sufficient for a suspensive appeal. It will not do for a devolutive appeal, because it is not for an amount fixed by the judge. The motion to dismiss on this ground must therefore prevail. It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed at appellants’ costs. Rehearing refused.