Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Holman v. M. L. Bath Co., 228 So. 2d 485.

17 citing documents.

Succession of Mary Grace Green Burley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
930, (1969), appeal after remand, (La.App.
Ryder v. Belgard 915 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Estelle Wiggins Gunter Ryder v. Glenn Edward Belgard, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Miles v. OUR LADY OF THE LAKE REG. MEDICAL 836 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
930 , (1969), appeal after remand, (La.
Taylor v. Hixson Autoplex of Alexandria, Inc. 781 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
930 , (1969), appeal after remand, (La.App.
Roach v. Pearl 673 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Knight v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 566 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Brown v. Brown 473 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Mouton v. Vallot 415 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Rayfield ex rel. Rayfield v. City of New Orleans 398 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
2nd Cir. 1969) writ refused , (1969), the court commented on the principal difficulty encountered in cases of this type: ‘Our jurisprudence is now settled that an employee may recover under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for disability resulting from a heart attack.
LeGlue Buick, Inc. v. Smith 390 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Ford, Bacon & Davis Construction Co. v. Doga 365 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Campbell v. Kansas City Southern Railroad Co. 297 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
2nd Cir. 1969) writ refused , (1969), the court commented on the principal difficulty encountered in cases of this type: "Our jurisprudence is now settled that an employee may recover under the Workmen's Compensation Act for disability resulting from a heart attack.
Roussel v. Noe 281 So. 2d 743 La. 1973
Fife v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 263 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
2nd Cir. 1969), writ refused, , , Judge *355 Bolin commented on the principal difficulty encountered by the courts in such cases as follows: “Our jurisprudence is now settled that an employee may recover under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for disability resulting from a heart attack.
Tannehill v. Tannehill 247 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
930 , , but the Supreme Court expressly reserved to the husband the right to urge the disavowal action in the event of adverse judgment following trial.
State v. Court of Appeal, Third Circuit 234 So. 2d 191 La. 1970